hermeticism

This is a continuation of the previous post on Konstantin Petrov’s book "The Secrets of Managing Humanity." Today we discuss the relationships between egregores and the relationship between man and God. Also, you will learn how to “acquire the holy spirit” (in three simple steps). Below is my summary / shortened translation. The opinions expressed here belong to Petrov, and I may disagree with them.

Egregores are created by people

There are many different groups of people in society, each formed based on some interests people are passionate about. These include music, smoking, drinking, ideology, religious beliefs, etc.

What is an “interest”? First, it is Information, an informational description, and an informational justification of the “interest." The music itself carries Information. A description of drinking and getting “high” is Information. Any ideology has some kind of brochure. And so on. All this Information is endowed with a Measure (algorithm, rules, rituals, etc.). All this “sits” in people’s heads, and these people “radiate” a Biofield [a physical carrier].

As a result, each group, distinguished by its special informational features, creates a corresponding egregore. An egregore is a super-personal factor to an individual. We have already considered that an egregore is “more powerful” than any person. Therefore, an egregore can kill a person, heal a person, or “consume” a person. An egregore influences individuals directly and shapes their circumstances primarily through the people around them, including those who significantly impact their lives. However, it’s important to note that although an egregore can control people as a suprapersonal force, it is not to be confused with the True God, the Creator, or the Almighty.

An egregore is a product of a group of people; it reflects their collective biofield, or “spirit.” Thus, the egregore is capable of action, but its effectiveness is limited because the “activity of the egregore” in society relies on individuals whose psyches are influenced by it. However, if a person’s psyche is not subordinate to an egregore, then the egregore has no power over that individual. If a person’s psyche is only partially influenced by the egregore—meaning only certain “fragments” of their psyche are affected—then it is these specific parts that determine the egregore’s ability to influence that person.

What is “social consciousness”? Can it truly exist? While it’s easy to grasp an individual’s consciousness, understanding the consciousness of society as a whole, referred to as “social consciousness,” poses a challenge. “Social consciousness” is an egregore defined by societal thought patterns. Imagine that humanity has completely (or partially) disappeared from Earth due to a global catastrophe. With no people left, the egregores persist. This scenario resembles what is believed to have happened to the civilization before ours, Atlantis. What happens to the egregores in such a situation? We can think about it: the collective biofields, which can be viewed as oscillatory systems, continue to “vibrate" even after the humanity is gone.

The “vibrations" of these systems lost their “supply" due to the absence of people. It is likely that the “weak" oscillatory systems quickly “died out.” However, the “powerful" oscillatory systems, known as egregores, could “oscillate" and “vibrate" for a very long time - just as the light from a dying star can last for millennia. These egregores may have survived until new people appeared and began to connect with them, leading to various consequences. Since our new human civilization developed according to an unfair concept of organization, it is quite possible that the surviving egregores played a role in this process. Ultimately, the most “powerful" among them endured.

Seeing the situation, God decided to launch a new civilization not via the biological path of development, as seen in the previous civilization of Atlantis, but through a technocratic approach. He recognized that living in a biological civilization, humanity could not break free from crowd-elite system [a system where a small elite controls the majority]. This new information-based state, in which all of humanity now exists, is fundamentally undermining the crowd-elite system .

Therefore, despite all the vileness of the current relations between people that are now triumphant in Russia (and in other countries), we live in extraordinary times! We have the good fortune to live at a turning point in the entire life structure of people on the planet. And not just to live, but to actively participate in establishing the triumph of justice on Earth, to live as God intended for man. The great prophets of mankind only dreamed of this: “Thy Will be done on Earth as it is in Heaven” (Christ). The moment has come in the development of mankind when it is necessary to take a decisive step and go through the stage of transformation from one state to another.

We must transition from an unjust way of life to a just one. Moving away from a mindset of animals and demons towards a more human mindset is essential. This transformation is part of God’s plan for humanity, designed as a comprehensive system with a meaningful purpose. The Creator has established this within the broader evolutionary process on our planet. We must align ourselves with God’s intentions. Therefore, we are indeed on the right path!

Noosphere

The term “noosphere” has gained popularity in the past decade [the 1980s]. But what does it actually mean? According to the dictionary the definition is as follows: Noosphere (from the Greek word “noos,” meaning “mind,” combined with “sphere”) refers to the sphere of interaction between nature and humanity. Within this sphere, human activity is crucial in influencing the environment. The term “noosphere” literally means “the sphere of the mind.” However, the definition provided in the dictionary deviates significantly from this literal meaning. The term “noosphere” does not belong to Vernadsky. It was proposed by the French researcher Edouard Le Roy. Subsequently, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin widely used it. Vernadsky himself began to use the term “noosphere” only in the last years of his life.

The term “noosphere” lacks a clear and universally accepted interpretation. The most common understanding is straightforward: it refers to the “sphere of the Mind.” This term designates the part of the biosphere that human activity influences and transforms. This interpretation allows us to discuss various historical noospheres, such as the one during the time of the ancient Greeks or the noosphere in the Middle Ages, as some authors, like Gumilev, have done. According to their viewpoint, the transition from the biosphere to the noosphere signifies the gradual development of the biosphere through human actions. The interpretation of the term “noosphere," commonly held among scientists, seems unjustified in the context of Vernadsky’s ideas and contradicts the essence of his teachings. Vernadsky frequently emphasized that developing society in harmony with Nature requires a special organization of society and establishing specific structures to facilitate this coordinated growth. This implies that the noosphere represents a state of the biosphere where development is intentional; in this state, Mind can guide the evolution of the biosphere in the interests of humanity and its future.

Noosphere

For these reasons, I believe it is more fitting to refer to the era of the noosphere, a time when humanity will be capable of rationally managing its power. This will enable a relationship with the environment, allowing society and Nature to thrive. Can our society establish limits on its development and consumption, adhering to the “ecological imperative”? Only history can answer this question. The transition of the biosphere to what we now refer to as the noosphere marks humanity’s entry into a new era of development. This era is characterized by the co-evolution—essentially the “fusion" - of humans and the biosphere. It will be a slow and challenging journey that requires the development of new principles to coordinate our actions and foster new ways of behaving. In essence, this entails the establishment of a new moral framework. Significant conclusions can be drawn from this information. Focusing solely on the topic at hand, it is important to note that it would be more accurate to equate the term “noosphere" with “sum of egregores” of the human society.

Egregoric Wars

The exact understanding of egregores among the globalists and their henchmen is not fully known. However, it is clear that they are utilizing this mechanism to its fullest extent. Throughout history, many egregores have been deliberately created by conceptually powerful individuals. This is particularly true for the egregores associated with various religious denominations, church and Masonic orders, brotherhoods, religious sects, and secular societies. When analyzing these organizations, which you, dear readers, may encounter in your lives, it is important to focus on one key aspect: the measure of the egregore. The most significant element is the algorithm or the sequence of rules that are inherent to each egregore. Those who join a specific egregore are essentially putting these rules into practice, leading to their materialization in the real world.

It is crucial to recognize that the nature of these rules can vary. For instance, rules concerning personal hygiene are one thing, while the rules governing interpersonal relationships or the interactions between countries and peoples are quite another. The more universal these rules are, the more vital they become for the organization of society. Global rules align with egregors of significant importance. These global egregores are established by those with conceptual power to achieve specific aims that must be realized by individuals who are influenced by these egregores within society as a whole. Egregores, in principle, cannot influence their “wards” in a way that leads them to solve problems foreign to the egregore itself, as there is no corresponding algorithm for this. Moreover, their design prevents “wards” from understanding the tasks associated with other conceptual powers.

The information associated with various symbols and measures supports different egregores. This includes verbal and textual information - such as “holy scriptures,” sermons, radio broadcasts, television programs, books, and newspapers – and symbolic and ritualistic elements like stars, crosses, armbands, stripes, badges, rites, parades, and processions. Young people, in particular, are drawn to the external aspects of these. They may not fully understand what they have become involved in, yet they feel connected to something significant, mysterious, and incomprehensible.

We should discuss egregoric wars, which occultists describe as a struggle between the “forces of good" and the "forces of evil" on a subtle plane. What does this mean in light of everything we've considered earlier? Egregores are oscillatory systems, and these oscillations are closely related in frequency. As a result, they inevitably influence one another in some manner.

Imagine a calm lake's surface. When a stone is thrown into the lake, waves ripple outwards in concentric circles. If a second stone is thrown in at some distance, it produces waves spreading in circles. These waves from the two stones will eventually meet. If one stone is larger than the other, the waves created will differ in size and intensity. This difference can lead to the cancellation of waves from the larger stone, overpowering those from the smaller one. Similarly, the smaller waves may become completely insignificant if the size difference is great. A similar phenomenon occurs with opposing egregores.

KGB and the Psychics

Based on the information presented in the chapter on egregores, it is natural to question the validity of certain religious teachings, beliefs, cults, and revelations received in the past compared to those in our modern times. I have personally communicated with many individuals who possess what is commonly called “superpowers.” These individuals are now categorized as “psychics," “clairvoyants,” etc.

Before the coup d'état of 1991, most of these individuals were under the protection and supervision of various special services. Some worked for the KGB, while others were associated with the Ministry of Internal Affairs or the GRU. These organizations utilized their abilities such as clairvoyance, reading thoughts from a distance, hypnosis, foresight (the ability to predict multiple possible outcomes), and even performing “miracles.”

A prominent example is Daniil Andreev and his work “Rose of the World.” The KGB recognized Andreev’s talent for acquiring intriguing information, prompting them to take a very direct and harsh approach. They isolated him in a solitary confinement cell to enable him to gather information without any external interference. They provided him with paper, a pen, and ink while continuously monitoring him to study the information he produced. After several years of observation, he was eventually released. What the KGB learned from this experience remains unclear, but it seems they did not fully grasp the nature of the phenomenon of egregores.

Daniil Andreev

After 1991, many special services reportedly began disintegrating, leaving little time for “clairvoyants.” As a result, these so-called “magicians" found themselves without support or oversight and, consequently, with no means to earn a living. Some, like me, were also in this predicament and were left without a homeland when the USSR “collapsed.” They needed to find a way to make a living in a country that seemed to be falling apart with no available jobs. This situation led to their “appearance to the public.”

In conversations with these individuals, many shared how information reached them. Some heard a direct voice that conveyed messages they remembered. Others received an urging to sit down and write, after which their hands would move independently, creating content they didn’t initially understand. Only after finishing did they begin to comprehend what they had written, though this understanding was not always clear. Some experienced vivid imaginings of certain events, which were later confirmed, such as earthquakes and plane crashes. Others received these insights solely through dreams. The signatures of the senders of these messages varied, but that detail is not significant for our current discussion.

It is crucial to consider how the “clairvoyants” themselves perceive the messages and their origins. Almost all of them - except for a very few - believe that they are receiving this information from God. Their ignorance and misunderstanding of the nature of egregores and the processes occurring in the universe, which are based on the trinity of “matter-information-measure,” along with a lack of understanding of global politics, contribute to grave errors in their assessments of social processes. Furthermore, the worldview of most of these “special" individuals tends to be egocentric at best, leading to significant misconceptions.

When dealing with specific problems, their assessments and recommendations can be quite accurate. However, as discussions broaden to global processes, they tend to make more frequent mistakes in their evaluations. It is worth noting that many have incredible ambitions. This phenomenon surrounding clairvoyants has existed since ancient times, even dating back to biblical times. Interestingly, one can find evidence of this in the Bible by reading it thoughtfully and analyzing it. I will provide just one example.

One Bible, Two Gods

Umberto Eco, an outstanding Italian writer, author of the works “The Name of the Rose” and “Foucault’s Pendulum” known in elite circles, professor at the University of Bologna, famous for his works in medieval studies, cultural history, and semiotics, expressed a seditious thought in an interview in early 1996: “The Bible is hyperinformation created over 2000 years, and only a madman can read it from beginning to end.” It turns out that according to Western statistics, 17% of people who read the Bible from beginning to end go crazy.

Umberto Eco is right. When one engages in careful and thoughtful reading of the Bible, one’s conscious can conflict with their subconscious. In one part of the Bible, they encounter a revelation from God stating, “Thou shalt not kill!” However, in another section, they find verses such as: “The Lord your God goes before you like a devouring fire, and he will destroy them (other nations) and bring them down before you...” or “When the Lord your God has destroyed the nations whose land the Lord your God is giving you...” (Deuteronomy). There are many similar examples throughout the Bible.

Below we discuss two prophets, Solomon and Isaiah. For readers unfamiliar with the Bible and its narratives, I will briefly explain the context of their prophecies. In biblical times, people lived in difficult and impoverished conditions, but they all longed for happiness and eagerly awaited the arrival of a messiah—a miracle worker who would bring joy to their lives. The prophets foretold when this messiah would come, his characteristics, and the deeds he would perform to ensure everyone’s happiness. Solomon was among the first prophets, and Isaiah followed shortly after him. Please read these two prophecies, reflect on them, and consider their similarities and differences.

Both prophets claim to speak on behalf of God and assert that He has given them revelations. However, these revelations differ.

a) According to Solomon, each person is accountable to God for their own sins. In contrast, Isaiah states that a savior will come and bear all sins upon himself, suggesting there is no need for concern since one's sins can simply be “written off” to this savior.

b) Solomon asserts that God would never allow a righteous man, especially His messenger, to be subjected to mockery; instead, He will deliver him from his enemies. On the other hand, Isaiah suggests that God can send His messenger to slaughter.

These comparisons raise the question: Was Christ truly crucified? Could God allow His messenger, a righteous man, to face mockery and a shameful execution? Each reader must reflect on this question personally: Would they consider it better for Christ to have been crucified or for there to have been no execution? We often say "gospel," meaning "good news." Yet, all four canonized Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John conclude with descriptions of the execution of Jesus Christ. Therefore, let each person examine their own conscience and determine what they consider to be good news: a shameful execution and the painful death of a righteous man or no execution, with God protecting His messenger from it?

The Quran states that there was no execution; rather, they “assumed” they did, suggesting some mysterious performance was enacted.

And [for] their saying, “Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.” And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption. And they did not kill him, for certain. [4:157]

Rather, Allah raised him to Himself. And ever is Allah Exalted in Might and Wise. [4:158]

In conclusion, we can pose a fundamental question: What kind of God is God? Is He the God of Solomon or the God of Isaiah? However, all those who believe in the Bible assert that God is love. This raises an interesting point: there appear to be two types of gods represented in the Bible:

The true God
The god of Satan

Which prophecy should we believe? Between the two prophecies presented, which was endorsed by the globalists of antiquity for practical application in society? The answer is clear: the global scenario of human life aligns with the prophecy of Isaiah. This suggests that we do not live in a way that pleases God, and as a result, we experience “no happiness in life.” What should we do? To live righteously, we must follow Solomon’s direct and just path.

To prevent any comparisons between these two prophecies, the Wisdom of Solomon was omitted from the Bible published in the West. Interestingly, the Russian church leaders did not consider doing the same.

Acquiring The Holy Spirit

What can we learn from this? It appears that Solomon received divine revelations from God, while Isaiah may have received revelations from one of the satanic egregores. Having already examined the contradictions present at the very foundation of the Bible, we must question how we can uncritically accept the subsequent “traditions of the elders,” along with the various “God's saints” and "fools” (who may be mentally ill), of whom there are many. All the historical “special people” - geniuses, oracles, sorcerers, prophets, miracle workers, saints, and righteous individuals - can be viewed through different lenses:

They could represent the will of God.
Their perception of God could be obscured to varying degrees by egregores.
They could distort the messages they received from God, altering the information to the point where it is completely replaced by their own misunderstandings, influenced by a corresponding egregore. This seems to be the case with Isaiah.

In the second and third cases, the revelations provided by God are replaced, leading to the emergence of false religions. The Latin term “religio" means “connection.” This replacement manifests in two main ways:

Religions of Man: In these religions, God is replaced by a human figure - often someone regarded as good or righteous. However, this person is still merely human and not God. As a result, during prayer, individuals do not communicate with God but rather with the soul of a deceased person.
Religions of Egregores: Here, God is replaced by an egregore, a collective consciousness generated by people who have accepted false notions about God into their hearts. This fiction begins to take the place of God for them. Consequently, during prayer, individuals are not connecting with God; instead, they engage with their own constructed belief - an egregore. This interaction can draw others in, and since an energy-information exchange occurs during prayer, people end up giving their energy to this illusion rather than to God.

The great Russian saint Seraphim of Sarov played a crucial role in restoring the understanding of life’s purpose for believers in the Russian Orthodox Church, a purpose defined by Jesus Christ that had been intentionally obscured over the years. Seraphim emphasized that every believer should strive to “acquire the Holy Spirit.”

From the perspective of modern knowledge, this means that every individual must engage in a direct dialogue with God, communicating with Him without intermediaries or the presence of “intercessors” or “servants” of God. To “acquire the Holy Spirit,” or to enter into communion with God and receive revelations from Him, Seraphim of Sarov withdrew from society to the forest (often referred to as the “desert,” an empty place free from distractions). In this solitude, he prayed fervently on a stone while maintaining a state of continuous fasting [for 1,000 consecutive nights].

Seraphim of Sarov

As He is omnipotent, God can communicate in various ways. He might speak directly, allowing a person to “hear a voice.” He can also inspire someone to write down His guidance or provide advice through dreams that reveal insights about the future. Additionally, God can create situations in a person’s life that encourage reflection and help them make the right decisions. God’s choice of conveying the information he needs to a person depends on the degree of a person’s readiness to receive information from God.

Another question arises: “How can a person talk to God?” This is a crucial point. For instance, how can God communicate something important to someone who believes God does not exist? To achieve this, extremely tense situations are often necessary. Many of these situations are created by people, not by God. Such events include fires, catastrophes, accidents, and other disasters. However, the most significant tense situations arise during wars, which is when many people turn to God.

In contrast, Prophet Muhammad received revelations from God directly through conversations and vivid visions. This represents the highest level of communication with God - a level that Seraphim of Sarov sought to attain.

Let us consider an analogy involving two radio stations operating on the same frequency. Each station is equipped with a transmitter and a receiver—the transmitter sends out information while the receiver captures it. When both the transmitters and receivers function optimally, precisely tuned to the designated frequency, and shielded from external interference, communication between the two stations is clear and effective.

However, problems arise if the equipment is not well-maintained or correctly calibrated, or if the components have suffered damage from falls or overheating, or if disruptive external influences such as welding equipment or generators are nearby. In such cases, the dialogue between the stations may become distorted or unclear. For instance, if one station’s receiver fails, it would be impossible for its operator to hear the messages from the other station.

This analogy applies to the relationship between God and man, so we observe that God’s communication remains constant and unhindered. Various texts convey that God is always attentive and does not rest or tire. In contrast, human beings function as both transmitters and receivers. Thus, the nature of this divine communication can be understood as occurring at a fundamental, bioenergetic level.

How To Acquire the Holy Spirit

1. The saints “survived on bread and water” while fasting strictly. This was a way to cleanse their bodies, as the human body acts as a receiving and transmitting device comprising various organs. Consequently, they purified all their cells with clean spring water.

2. They left the church to retreat to the “desert.” Some sought refuge in caves for extended periods, sometimes lasting years. Others confined themselves to cells without any contact with the outside world. Some chose to live as hermits in the forest for a long time. For instance, Seraphim of Sarov abandoned the church to seek solitude in nature. What does this mean? It suggests that one cannot fully acquire the “Holy Spirit” within the church, as many saints chose to leave it for these solitary places. And here’s the reason why.

There is a lot of “interference” in the church. Concentration, tuning a person to the “wave” of communication with God, is hindered by many things:

The church’s internal structure (icons, gilding, paintings on the walls and ceilings, gilded chandeliers, candles) is distracting and interferes with concentration. This especially affects young parishioners.
The priest is conducting the service. Firstly, he is all dressed up and decorated, and people are looking at all his gold jewelry [typical to the Russian orthodox church]. Secondly, he is conducting the service, saying something, waving the censer, etc... In general, this does not allow you to concentrate.
The flock. Someone coughed. A beautiful woman’s face flashed - sinful thoughts appeared. The man next to you was wearing a sweater with an interesting pattern, and you began to examine it. If there are a lot of people, then from time to time, you are pushed, either from behind or from the side. And so on and so forth. They don’t let you think about God...
How beautifully the choir sings! What are they singing about? This is clear... but this is incomprehensible...
How pleasant is the smell of incense! What was I thinking about?...

In summary, it is fundamentally impossible to “acquire the Holy Spirit” in the church.

3. They prayed fervently. By doing this, they tuned their “receiving and transmitting device” to the wave of communication with God. This is similar to how you turn the tuning knob of a receiver to the desired wave. Here the “tuning knob” is turned mentally, not mechanically. Using continuous prayer, they tuned their brain algorithm for receiving and converting information to the algorithm of “God’s conversation.” They tried to bring their personal measure (the matrix of their state) as close as possible to the Universal Measure, which is controlled solely by God. As soon as their personal measure entered the necessary frequency range of the Universal Measure, information from God began to flow to them. We are talking about getting into the necessary frequency range because the frequencies cannot exactly coincide in principle since, in this case, a person himself must become the True God, which is impossible. God himself carries out the final “tuning” to enter into communication.

Tuning to God

Humanity doesn’t fully understand the biofield’s characteristics because our scientific instruments can’t measure it yet. This doesn’t imply that it doesn’t exist; the human body is more sensitive than even the most precise devices. As for the problem of creating “artificial intelligence,” the whole problem is that someone wants to create a prosthesis instead of learning to use their own brains. It is time to learn to trust human intuition, not just the device readings.

Human capabilities are vast, yet we know little about ourselves. This chapter introduces the concepts of biofields and egregores, which are foundational for understanding spiritual culture. Ignorance of how egregores influence individuals can distort free will and psyche, leading to negative consequences and severing communication with God.

The church deliberately hid this knowledge from humanity. They hid it to keep people in obedience, preserving the system of “elitism,” in which a handful of globalists parasitize on millions of workers while pitting these workers against each other. How to resist it? There is only one defense against all egregores controlled by the biblical conceptual authority: direct communication with God according to conscience, without intermediaries and “intercessors.” Such communication carries information foreign to all managing egregores.